Everybody spies on everybody.

When it comes to the national security agencies on our blue planet, past, present and those to come, it’s a universal truth.

The NSA’s of the world feel at their most comfortable when they know as many secrets about their friends and enemies as possible.

About you and me – and whoever is hiding under the bed.


Historically it’s always been like that and it’s something we all have to live with.

I don’t believe any amount of legislation, bi- or multilateral agreements will ever put an end to that.

The authorities and politicians that are supposed to control these agencies may promise more openness and transparency, but in the end these agencies can only work from the shadows, if not outright darkness.

That’s how they operate.

It’s their only possible way of working.

They can’t be out in the open.

It’s against their very nature.


On the other hand, somebody have to rein them in.

Somebody have to limit their power.

And I don’t believe they themselves have enough restraint or self-discipline to do that.

The more they know. The better they feel.

So, who is to decide how much and what kind of information for them to sift through and collect?

How much and what kind of information to store?

Who is to decide what to do with this information?

Now and in the future?

Is it you and me?

Off course it is.

It is you and me who should decide this.

Or is it really?

These agencies are our agencies.

Or are they really?


They are supposed to protect you and me and act as some sort of guarantee of stability and peace in your country and my country and in the countries of our allies.

On that all the NSA’s in all countries on our blue planet would agree I’m sure.

They are there to guarantee the integrity of their individual nations.

How they go about doing this is quite another matter.


Now your country might not be my country, your allies might not be my allies, your political views, not my political views, your idea of privacy, not my idea of privacy, but for most of us, ordinary citizens of the world, it all boils down to be able to live a secure, peaceful life where we can go along with our daily business.

And privacy is a very important part of that.

Privacy matters.


“If you have nothing to hide, you have nothing to fear” as they welcome you at the Utah Data Center, “designed to support the Intelligence Community’s efforts to monitor, strengthen and protect the nation.”

I don’t feel I have anything to hide as such. But I do cherish my privacy.

I want to decide what to share, when to share it and with whom.

It should be up to each and every one of us to decide that.

Whether we want to stay completely private without even a mobile phone to log our movements constantly or to share all our golden moments on social media or broadcast every intimate thought and action online 24/7 is up to us.

That’s your decision.

That’s my decision.

And no security agency in any country should have any right to bother us about that.

However, as we all know by now, this isn’t reality.


Surveillance is the business model of the internet.

The security agencies and the huge commercial internet companies, not exactly defenders of privacy rights themselves, grab as much personal information about us and our online activities as they can possibly get away with. Information often fed more than voluntarily to them by us via social media, search engines etc. etc. and used in more or less any witch way they see fit.

Being it to fight terrorism, prevent or conduct future cyberwars, control populations or individuals, sell soap powder, books or music or build detailed psychological profiles of us in order to predict what we might want, do, say or think in a second, tomorrow, next year or in ten years time.

Collectively and individually they would like to know even more than we know about ourselves on a conscious level.

That’s creepy.

But it’s a fact.

We live in the golden age of intelligence.


So what can we do about this?

Do we want to do anything?

Do we need to do anything?

Should we pull the plug and avoid communication and the internet all together?

Should we censor ourselves so as not to get in the spotlight?

Should we avoid controversial topics online/offline out of fear of government surveillance?

Should we be worried about privacy rights and freedom of speech?

These are some of the important questions we have to continue to ask ourselves individually and collectively the coming year – and for many years to come.


To my mind we have to speak out in public.

We have to discuss in public.

We have to disagree in public.

At least those of us who are fortunate enough to live in societies open enough to tolerate this kind of debate.

Those of us who do not put our lives or jobs at risk nor those of our families and friends.

That’s our duty to ourselves and the societies we live in.

That’s our duty to the future of our children and the world of tomorrow.

That’s part of our human rights.

That’s what former NSA contractor, whistleblower Edward Snowdens revelations in The Washington Post and Britain’s The Guardian newspaper over the past year are all about.

That’s why I wish you, Edward Joseph Snowden in Russia, a hopefully Safe and Happy New Year, knowing you are paying a huge prize following your conviction!

And I wish a Happy New Year to you, my dear reader, and to every living freedom loving soul on Our Blue Planet.

A healthy society needs not only to protect, but also to encourage dissent.

Dissent is the lifeblood of a healthy society.

Dissent is the lifeblood of democracy.





The Guardian and The Washington Post was awarded the highest accolade in US journalism, winning The 2014 Pulitzer prize for Public Service for stories on NSA surveillance.

(Update April 14, 2014)



Free RSS subscription

Share this post:
Tagged with: